|
|
|
|
|
 |
WS NIS Administrator only (login)
|
Version: 4.0
Site visitors:     
|
|
|
National Profile
» Water Supply Backlog - Households (Access Below RDP) |
| Water Supply Backlog - Households (Access Below RDP) |
| Province |
Total Water Below RDP HH - April 1994 |
Total Water Below RDP HH - Oct 2001 |
Total Water Below RDP HH - April 2009 |
Total Water Below RDP HH - April 2010 |
% Backlog |
|
Eastern Cape |
883,036 |
726,240 |
206,166 |
145,361 |
18.00 |
|
Free State |
176,796 |
115,444 |
2,249 |
0 |
0 |
|
Gauteng |
385,082 |
279,382 |
60,117 |
37,590 |
5.00 |
|
KwaZulu-Natal |
834,818 |
859,431 |
393,749 |
325,596 |
40.00 |
|
Limpopo |
560,073 |
502,225 |
217,995 |
167,122 |
20.00 |
|
Mpumalanga |
291,312 |
240,643 |
88,105 |
65,835 |
8.00 |
|
North West |
270,038 |
239,941 |
78,258 |
58,051 |
7.00 |
|
Northern Cape |
100,526 |
42,959 |
16,059 |
13,069 |
2.00 |
|
Western Cape |
389,546 |
99,457 |
6,454 |
4,726 |
1.00 |
|
National |
3,891,227 |
3,105,722 |
1,069,152 |
817,350 |
100.00 |
Access Below RDP Households - October 2001: Total number of households with access to a water supply below the RDP service level as per the Census 2001 results. This includes all households with access to formal water supply infrastructure but below RDP service levels, such as communal tap >200m from dwelling, unacceptable quality, unacceptable flow, etc.
Access Below RDP Households - April 2009: Total number of households with access to a water supply below RDP service levels as per Census 2001 and updated with actual project progress prior to MIG implementation. Since MIG implementation, annual delivery is estimated based on MIG Allocation.
Access Below RDP Households - April 2010: Total number of households with access to a water supply below RDP service levels as per Census 2001 and updated with actual project progress prior to MIG implementation. Since MIG implementation, annual delivery is estimated based on MIG Allocation.
% Backlog: Number of needy households as a % of the total estimated backlog.
|
Click here to go back.
Processing took 1.25 seconds. |
|
|
|
|
|